god is got Great
And neither is this book. Christopher Hitchens god is not Great has a great book hidden in it somewhere underneath the diatribe. And annoyingly it's way under referenced. And even more annoyingly the little referencing there is, is in my paperback copy (published by "12" in 2007) incorrectly referenced. I suspect it's taken straight from the hardback without any thought about the changing of the page numbers.
If you didn't like The God Delusion for its language, then you're going to loath god is not Great. And frankly even I, who's batting on the same team as Hitchens, had trouble with some the outlandishness of it. Let's take look.
'In 2004, a soap-opera film about the death of Jesus was produced by an Australian fascist and ham actor named Mel Gibson. Mr. Gibson adheres to a crackpot and schismatic Catholic sect consisting mainly of himself and of his even more thuggish father...' [131]
Now maybe the above is true, but there's not a further explanation, reference or footnote for any of this. It reads like opinions backed up by bile. Gibson has never had even an Oscar nomination for acting, but could you really call him a ham? What sect of Catholicism is Gibson in? What's the story with Gibson's father being a fascist? Is it common knowledge, and I'm just out of the loop?
I recommend the book to those who want a good laugh.
Labels: Books
6 Comments:
Happy new year!
(joke)I'm sure, then, that Hitchens is a plant by religious factions with the hidden purpose of discrediting Atheism. (/joke)
I'm sure this book will be referenced by theologists everywhere to demonstrate that atheism must resort to outrageous exaggeration to make any points.
Hey, good to see you again!
The lack of referencing is naughty, but factually the Gibson paragraph is spot on- he *does* follow a schismatic group that rejects the Second Vatican Council, his father *is* a Holocaust-denying loon, and... have you ever seen 'Bird on a Wire'?
This is a good article thwacking people who deserve to be thwacked.
Sadly, neither Hitchens or Dawkins do Atheists any favours at all.
If you want a concise but thorough analysis of where Dawkins damages the Atheist cause, you might try "The Dawkins Delusion", by Alister McGrath:
http://www.amazon.com/Dawkins-Delusion-Atheist-Fundamentalism-Denial/dp/083083446X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1210068484&sr=1-1
It's a gracious response to Dawkins' blustering :-).
Nano! Long time no see! Where's that book report on the Qur'an?
(Hangs head in shame).
Alas, I am severely chastened for placing too much other reading (and tender writing for too many Federal Government bodies) as higher priorities. :-(.
Part of the fruit of living in Devil Bunny City and travelling all over the countryside on behalf of my employer....
....must put on my revised goals for the rest of 2008!
Post a Comment
<< Home